000 07814cam a2200757Ii 4500
001 ocn971891197
003 OCoLC
005 20220525095740.0
006 m d
007 cr cnu|||unuuu
008 170209s2017 sz ob 000 0 eng d
015 _aGBB8N7281
_2bnb
016 7 _a019164730
_2Uk
020 _a9783319521503
_q(electronic bk.)
020 _a3319521500
_q(electronic bk.)
020 _a3319521497
020 _a9783319521497
020 _z9783319521497
_q(print)
024 7 _a10.1007/978-3-319-52150-3
_2doi
035 _a1464096
035 _a(OCoLC)971891197
_z(OCoLC)972229321
_z(OCoLC)972424954
_z(OCoLC)972593084
_z(OCoLC)972828181
_z(OCoLC)972999860
_z(OCoLC)973139798
_z(OCoLC)981814078
_z(OCoLC)1011983487
_z(OCoLC)1048114017
_z(OCoLC)1097115867
_z(OCoLC)1112586582
_z(OCoLC)1113384894
_z(OCoLC)1116182438
_z(OCoLC)1122816396
_z(OCoLC)1203986563
_z(OCoLC)1223980990
037 _acom.springer.onix.9783319521503
_bSpringer Nature
040 _aN$T
_beng
_erda
_epn
_cN$T
_dEBLCP
_dIDEBK
_dGW5XE
_dN$T
_dUAB
_dYDX
_dCOO
_dCCO
_dIOG
_dMERER
_dESU
_dZ5A
_dJG0
_dOCLCQ
_dJBG
_dIAD
_dICW
_dICN
_dOTZ
_dOCLCQ
_dAZU
_dUPM
_dVT2
_dOCLCQ
_dU3W
_dCAUOI
_dOCLCQ
_dOCLCF
_dKSU
_dWYU
_dAU@
_dOCLCQ
_dUKMGB
_dUKAHL
_dOCLCQ
_dERF
_dOCLCQ
_dDCT
_dORZ
049 _aMAIN
050 4 _aTD194.6
072 7 _aBUS
_x054000
_2bisacsh
072 7 _aRNF
_2bicssc
072 7 _aRNF
_2thema
082 0 4 _a333.71/4
_223
082 0 4 _a333.7
100 1 _aZele�n�akov�a, Martina,
_eauthor.
245 1 0 _aUsing risk analysis for flood protection assessment /
_cMartina Zele�n�akov�a, Lenka Zvij�akov�a.
264 1 _aCham, Switzerland :
_bSpringer,
_c2017.
300 _a1 online resource
336 _atext
_btxt
_2rdacontent
337 _acomputer
_bc
_2rdamedia
338 _aonline resource
_bcr
_2rdacarrier
347 _atext file
_bPDF
_2rda
504 _aIncludes bibliographical references.
505 0 _aPreface; Acknowledgements; Contents; Abbreviations; 1 Environmental Impact Assessment-State of the Art; 1.1 Environmental Impact Assessment; 1.1.1 Origins and Development of EIA; 1.1.2 The State of Environmental Impact Assessment; 1.1.2.1 Theory and EIA; 1.1.2.2 The Practice of EIA; 1.1.2.3 EIA Effectiveness; 1.1.3 Strengths, Weaknesses, Threats and Opportunities of EIA; 1.1.4 EIA Methods; 1.1.4.1 Types of Methods; 1.1.4.2 Impact and Manners (Methods and Process) of Its Assessment; Prediction of Potential Impact on the Environment; Predictive Methods in EIA; 1.1.5 EIA in Slovakia.
505 8 _a1.1.5.1 Analysis and Evaluation of the Survey in Slovakia1.2 Risk Analysis; 1.2.1 Historical Background; 1.2.2 The Importance of Risk Analysis; 1.2.3 Definition of Risk Analysis; 1.2.4 Risk-Analysis Methods; 1.2.5 Parts of Risk Analysis; 1.2.6 The Uses of Risk Analysis and Assessment; 1.3 Risk Analysis and Assessment Within Environmental Impact Assessment; 1.3.1 Background to EIA and RA; 1.3.2 Similarities Between Environmental Risk Assessment and Environmental Impact Assessment; 1.3.3 Existing Approaches to Integrating RA into EIA; 1.4 Summary and Implications; References.
505 8 _a2 Risk Analysis in Impact Assessment2.1 Methodology and Research Design; 2.1.1 Methodology; 2.1.2 Research Design; 2.2 Establishing the Context; 2.2.1 Characteristics of the Current State of the Environment in the Affected Area; 2.2.2 Explanation of the Reasons Why the Proposed Activity Is Required in the Locality; 2.2.3 Brief Description of Alternatives to the Proposed Activity Aj (A0, AI, AII); 2.3 Risk Analysis; 2.3.1 Creation a Set of Risk Factors (A-Z); 2.3.2 Determine the Relative Importance (Weight) of the Risk Factors (wi); 2.3.3 Creation of Risk Criteria for Risk Factors.
505 8 _a2.3.4 Determination Score of Criterion (0.2-1.0)2.4 Decision-Making; 2.4.1 Comparison of Alternatives of the Proposed Activity and the Proposal of the Optimal Alternative; 2.4.1.1 Multiparametric Determination of the Risk rj for Each Alternative of the Proposed Activity; 2.4.1.2 Assessing the Level of Risk of the Proposed Activity for the Environment; 2.4.1.3 Selection of the Optimal Alternative or Setting of the Order of Suitability for the Assessed Alternatives; 2.4.1.4 Reasoning of the Proposal of the Optimal Alternative.
505 8 _a2.4.2 Proposed Measures for the Prevention, Elimination, Minimization, and Compensation of Impacts on the Environment and HealthReferences; 3 Case Study-Flood-Protection Measures at Kru�zlov, North-Eastern Slovakia; 3.1 Basic Data About the Nature and Localization of the Proposed Activity; 3.2 Establishing the Context; 3.2.1 Characteristics of the Current State of the Environment in the Affected Area; 3.2.2 Explanation of the Reasons Why the Proposed Activity is Required in the Locality; 3.2.3 Brief Description of Alternatives of the Proposed Activity Aj (A0, AI, AII); 3.3 Risk Analysis.
520 _aThis book explores the benefits of using risk analysis techniques in the evaluation of flood protection structures, and examines the results of the environmental impact assessment for selected planned flood protection projects. The objective of the book is to propose a methodology for environmental impact assessment in water management. In more detail, flood mitigation measures are investigated with the aim of selecting the best option for the approval process. This methodology is intended to streamline the process of environmental impact assessment for structures in the field of the water management. The book?s environmental impact assessment system for water management structures analyzes the respective risks for different options. The results are intended to support the selection of future projects that pose minimum risks to the environment. Comparison of alternatives and designation of the optimal variant are implemented on the basis of selected criteria that objectively describe the characteristics of the planned alternatives and their respective impacts on the environment. The proposed Guideline for environmental impact assessment of flood protection objects employs multi-parametric risk analysis, a method intended to not only enhance the transparency and sensitivity of the evaluation process, but also successfully addresses the requirements of environmental impact assessment systems in the European Union. These modifications are intended to improve the outcomes of the environmental impact assessment, but may also be applied to other infrastructure projects. The case study proves that the primary aim? to improve transparency and minimize subjectivity in the environmental impact assessment process specific to flood protection structure projects? is met for the planned project in Kru�zlov, Slovakia.
588 0 _aOnline resource; title from PDF title page (SpringerLink, viewed February 21, 2017).
590 _aMaster record variable field(s) change: 072
650 0 _aEnvironmental impact analysis.
650 0 _aFlood damage prevention.
650 0 _aFloods
_xRisk assessment.
650 7 _aBUSINESS & ECONOMICS
_xReal Estate
_xGeneral.
_2bisacsh
650 7 _aEnvironmental management.
_2bicssc
650 7 _aEnvironmental science, engineering & technology.
_2bicssc
650 7 _aCivil engineering, surveying & building.
_2bicssc
650 7 _aEnvironmental monitoring.
_2bicssc
650 7 _aNatural disasters.
_2bicssc
650 7 _aEnvironmental impact analysis.
_2fast
_0(OCoLC)fst00913055
650 7 _aFlood damage prevention.
_2fast
_0(OCoLC)fst00927487
655 4 _aElectronic books.
700 1 _aZvij�akov�a, Lenka,
_eauthor.
773 0 _tSpringer eBooks
776 0 8 _iPrinted edition:
_z9783319521497
850 _aVJRL-AP
856 4 0 _3EBSCOhost
_uhttps://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&scope=site&db=nlebk&db=nlabk&AN=1464096
942 _2nlm
_cEBK
999 _c36021
_d36021